Jump to content


Photo

when to use Tlag


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 ARINDAM PAL

ARINDAM PAL

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 10 posts

Posted 19 July 2013 - 11:49 AM

Dear

I have developed a correlation model for a BCS class 2, IR drug formulation (taking one test (T) & one ref. product ® for internal validation). T is BE to R in a biostudy.

The developed ivivc model gives me an under-prediction (in terms of %PE) of Cmax by 8% and over-prediction of AUC by 4-5% for both test & ref. products. On average, I get the %PE of the model, for Cmax - 3% and for AUC - 9%.

The %PE for both the products for Cmax & AUC are well within 10% and the average %PE are also within 10% (as I mentioned).

Can I count the model as "good" for predicting in vivo profiles ?

 

I also like to understand when Tcut-off can be used and the rationale.

Going by the knowledge of Tcut-off, I chose a Tcut-off of 3.5 hrs (in vivo median Tmax for both the products are 2.33 hrs and range is 1-4.5 hrs), this reduced the error to 2% & 4% for Cmax & AUC respectively, of the model.

But, should I go by a Tcut-off like that to simply reduce PE ?

 

 

Regards

Arindam



#2 ARINDAM PAL

ARINDAM PAL

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 10 posts

Posted 22 July 2013 - 02:58 PM

Any response on this ?
Your kind response is awaited.

Regards
Arindam


arindam_pal wrote:

Dear
I have developed a correlation model for a BCS class 2, IR drug formulation (taking one test (T) & one ref. product ® for internal validation). T is BE to R in a biostudy.
The developed ivivc model gives me an under-prediction (in terms of %PE) of Cmax by 8% and over-prediction of AUC by 4-5% for both test & ref. products. On average, I get the %PE of the model, for Cmax - 3% and for AUC - 9%.
The %PE for both the products for Cmax & AUC are well within 10% and the average %PE are also within 10% (as I mentioned).
Can I count the model as "good" for predicting in vivo profiles ?

I also like to understand when Tcut-off can be used and the rationale.
Going by the knowledge of Tcut-off, I chose a Tcut-off of 3.5 hrs (in vivo median Tmax for both the products are 2.33 hrs and range is 1-4.5 hrs), this reduced the error to 2% & 4% for Cmax & AUC respectively, of the model.
But, should I go by a Tcut-off like that to simply reduce PE ?


Regards
Arindam



#3 ARINDAM PAL

ARINDAM PAL

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 10 posts

Posted 23 July 2013 - 12:49 PM

Dear Simon

 

Sorry for the inconvenience, it should be "Tcut-off" instead of Tlag.

 

Eagerly waiting for your kind & logical explanation.

 

Thanks

Arindam






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users