6 replies to this topic

[Vijay Ivaturi]

Can someone provide a standard way to cite the use Phoenix in reports/publications etc. Is it different for citing NLME vs NCA vs IVIVC etc..

 

Thanks 

Vijay

[Wendt]

The IP is owned by Certara, so this would be how to cite:

   Phoenix 1.4, Certara, L.P., 210 North Tucker Boulevard Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63101 USA

 

For related products like NLME, you would just substitute the product name/version (e.g. Phoenix NLME 1.3 or Phoenix IVIVC Toolkit 2.2) – the company reference reference would remain the same. Note, that NCA belongs to Phoenix WinNonlin 6.4.

 

Bernd

[Vijay Ivaturi]

Thanks, Bernd. To be specific, in a publication, if I mention that Phoenix NLME was used to do the analysis and add a reference to it, it should read -

 

References

Phoenix NLME 1.4 Certara, L.P., 210 North Tucker Boulevard Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63101 USA

 

but if its NCA then

Phoenix WinNonlin 6.4. Certara, L.P., 210 North Tucker Boulevard Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63101 USA

 

Vijay

[Wendt]

You'll find the correct version number for NLME and WinNonlin under Phoenix Help menu: About Phoenix. If you are using Phoenix 1.4 the following would be correct:

 

Phoenix NLME 1.3 Certara, L.P., 210 North Tucker Boulevard Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63101 USA

 

and the WinNonlin reference you showed is correct.

 

 

 

Bernd

[Wendt]

Since we recently moved our headquarter to Princeton, the new reference how to cite Phoenix has changed. Please use the following going forward:

 

Phoenix WinNonlin 6.4. Certara USA, Inc., 103 Carnegie Center, Suite 300, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA

 

 

Bernd

[Vijay Ivaturi]

Thanks for the update Bernd!

[Simon Davis]

I recently confirmed all of our current product and their registered or trademarked symbols.  This is how they should read:

 

• Phoenix®
• Phoenix WinNonlin™
• Phoenix NLME™
• Phoenix IVIVC™
• PK Submit™
• Certara Integral™

Certara USA, Inc., 100 Overlook Center, Suite 101, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA