Jump to content


Photo

co-crystal


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 mtim

mtim

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts

Posted 30 March 2016 - 05:48 AM

If I have two separate crystal structures:
a) co-crystal of a protein with a ligand;

B) crystal of a protein alone
What can I study using information from “a)” : docking accuracy, best binding pose/highly ranked binding pose?
What can I study using information from “b”: comparing changes in binding site conformations? What metrics describes these changes?

 

regards, m



#2 Wendt

Wendt

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 20 posts

Posted 30 March 2016 - 08:39 AM

These are pretty basic questions on docking:

 re a) you can use co-crystal structures to re-dock the bound ligand and measure how close the docked pose fits the experimental pose, i.e. in terms of rmsd.

re B) you can compare the protein part of the co-crystal with the protein alone to identify potential movements of sidechains or backbone upon ligand binding, i.e. examine the extent of induced fit. 

 

I am not sure what you want to achieve. Can you please put your questions into perspective.

 

Best,

 

Bernd






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users