Can someone provide a standard way to cite the use Phoenix in reports/publications etc. Is it different for citing NLME vs NCA vs IVIVC etc..
Jump to content
Posted 04 December 2014 - 07:38 AM
The IP is owned by Certara, so this would be how to cite:
Phoenix 1.4, Certara, L.P., 210 North Tucker Boulevard Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63101 USA
For related products like NLME, you would just substitute the product name/version (e.g. Phoenix NLME 1.3 or Phoenix IVIVC Toolkit 2.2) – the company reference reference would remain the same. Note, that NCA belongs to Phoenix WinNonlin 6.4.
Posted 04 December 2014 - 10:58 AM
Thanks, Bernd. To be specific, in a publication, if I mention that Phoenix NLME was used to do the analysis and add a reference to it, it should read -
Phoenix NLME 1.4 Certara, L.P., 210 North Tucker Boulevard Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63101 USA
but if its NCA then
Phoenix WinNonlin 6.4. Certara, L.P., 210 North Tucker Boulevard Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63101 USA
Posted 04 December 2014 - 11:04 AM
You'll find the correct version number for NLME and WinNonlin under Phoenix Help menu: About Phoenix. If you are using Phoenix 1.4 the following would be correct:
Phoenix NLME 1.3 Certara, L.P., 210 North Tucker Boulevard Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63101 USA
and the WinNonlin reference you showed is correct.
Posted 25 October 2019 - 08:55 PM
I recently confirmed all of our current product and their registered or trademarked symbols. This is how they should read:
Certara USA, Inc., 100 Overlook Center, Suite 101, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users