Edited by Harper, 19 December 2021 - 05:45 AM.
![Photo](https://support.certara.com/forums/public/style_images/master/profile/default_large.png)
The difference of AUC value between NCA and Monte Carlo simulation based on Pop PK model
Started by
Harper
, Dec 13 2021 04:54 PM
NLME modelling and simulation
2 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 13 December 2021 - 04:54 PM
Dear all.
I used Phoenix NLME to successfully build a 2 compartment combining residual Pop PK model with lag time, and implemented Monte Carlo simulation to calculate AUC values based on this, but found that the results calculated by Pop PK model are very different from those based on NCA method.
However, it should be noted that the database characteristics of the 3000 virtual individuals used in the simulation were copied from the modeling database, which may exclude this effect.
I'm a beginner and I would appreciate if you could help me, even if it's just a rough guide.
Thanks in advance.
- Harper, Austingar, Donaldjet and 1 other like this
#2
Posted 15 December 2021 - 05:11 AM
Dear all.I used Phoenix NLME to successfully build a 2 compartment combining residual Pop PK model with lag time, and implemented Monte Carlo simulation to calculate AUC values based on this, but found that the results calculated by Pop PK model are very different from those based on NCA method.However, it should be noted that the database characteristics of the 3000 virtual individuals used in the simulation were copied from the modeling database, which may exclude this effect.I'm a beginner and I would appreciate if you could help me, even if it's just a rough guide.Thanks in advance.
#3
Posted 15 December 2021 - 05:22 PM
Hi Harper, your code uses;
deriv(AUC = C)
so you need to be carefuly becase this is being integrated over time so when you requested it in your table you need to make sure you are comparing a large time to be comparable with the NCA generated AUCinf (or AUClast).
see the table below where I compare AUC at 24, 999 and 9999.
At first glance, I am not sure your model is capturing the sustained absorption, what is the mechanism of delivery, maybe a Zero order might help?
Simon.
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: NLME, modelling and simulation
Certara Forums →
Pirana and RsNLME →
Execute NLME automatically for a loopStarted by linda , 12 Jan 2024 ![]() |
|
![]()
|
||
Certara Forums →
Modelling and Simulation →
self-define model structure with if, elseStarted by linda , 11 Jan 2024 ![]() |
|
![]()
|
||
Certara Forums →
Modelling and Simulation →
How to implement "PWM and PBM" under Windows MPI settingsStarted by 0521 , 19 Jul 2023 ![]() |
|
![]()
|
||
Certara Forums →
Modelling and Simulation →
Initial fcntheta1 NaN error in NLMEStarted by 18963422692 , 20 Mar 2023 ![]() |
|
![]()
|
||
Certara Forums →
Phoenix WNL basics →
Samples not taken after every doseStarted by Ronette Gehring , 24 Feb 2021 ![]() |
|
![]()
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users