Jason,
Many thanks for your help! I understand the 10% difference, now.
I have tried both of your suggestions and found the second version to be more appropriate in my case.
Thank you
Bertold
Integration for AUC in PML model
Started by
Kathryn
, Sep 19 2011 04:03 PM
22 replies to this topic
#22
mippolito@jhu.edu
-
- Members
-
- 1 posts
Newbie
Posted 22 May 2019 - 08:33 PM
I would like to derive AUC as a secondary parameter from a pop PK model but the code included in this thread is not recognized in the current NLME build e.g. secondary(AUC = AaDose/tvV/tvKe). Is there anybody out there who can please provide the updated code? Thank you.
#23
Simon Davis
-
- Administrators
-
- 1,331 posts
Advanced Member
Posted 23 May 2019 - 07:16 AM
If this no longer valid, then it suggests that you have changed one of the built-in models and then it will depend on what changes you made as to what the valid formula would be. If you are in text mode you can simply use;
deriv(AUCx=C)
more options like partial AUCs are described on the forum before e.g. earlier in this actual thread and also here;
https://support.cert...rameter/?p=1639
Simon
- mippolito@jhu.edu likes this
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
